Äåòñêàÿ àãðåññèâíîñòü. Ïñèõîäèàãíîñòèêà è êîððåêöèÿ

Ñòðàíèöà: 1 ... 81828384858687
  1. Bandura A., Walters R. Social learning and personality development.– N.Y., 1965.– 329 p.

38. Berkowitz L. Aggression: A social psychological analysis.– N.Y.– 1962.

  1. Biller H.A. Father, child and sex role. Haternal deteminants of personality development.– Lexington, Mass.– 1971.– 194 p.
  1. Bjorkqvist K., Lagerspetz K., Kankiainen A. Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and inderect aggression // Aggress. Behav.– 992.– 18, N 2.– pp. 117–127.
  2. Black S.L., Bevan S. At the movies with Buss and Durkee: A natural experiment on film violence// Aggress. Behav.1992. –18, N 1, pp. 37–45.
  3. Boone S.L. Aggression in african–american boys: A discriminant analisis// Genet., Soc. and Gen. Psycol. Monogr.– 1991.– 117, N 2 .– pp. 205–228.
  4. Borden R. Witnessed aggression: Influence of an observer sex and values on aggressive responding// J. of Person. and Soc. Psyc hology.– 1975.– 31.– pp. 27–29.
  5. Buss A. The psychology of aggression.– N.Y.– 1961.
  6. Dantzer R. Agir ou se deffendre // Sci et vie.– 1989.– hors ser., N 168.– pp. 80–83.

46. Dollard J. et al. Frustration and Agression.– New–Haven, Yale.– 1939.

  1. Donohue T.R. et al. The impact of television's role models on physically abused children // Child Study journal.– 1988.– 18.– N 3.–pp. 233–247.
  1. Hokanson J.E. et al. The Modification of Autonomic Responses During Agressive Interchange // Journ. of Personality.– 1968,– 36, N 3, pp. 386–404.
  2. Kahl R. Die Lust der Kinder und der Horror der Kulturkritik // Arbeitsh. Kinderpsychoanal.– 1989.– N 10.– pp. 112–118.
  3. Kaufmann H. Agression and Altruism.– N.Y.– 1970.
  4. Lewis M., Rosenblum L. (eds.) Frendship and peer relation.– N.Y..– 1975.
  5. Kitron D.G. The application of psychodynamic methods within the framework of behavior therapy // J. Contemp. Psychother.1991, N 1.– pp. 53–62.
  6. Leyens J–P., Dunand M. Priming aggressive throughts: The effects of the anticepation of a violent movie upon the aggressive behaviores of tne spectators// Enr. J. Soc. Psychol.– 1991.– 21, N 6, pp. 507–516.
  7. Lindsley O., Skinner B., Solomon H. Studies in behavior therapy.– Status Report I, Waltham, 1953.
  8. Maccoby E., Jacklin C. The psychology of sex deferences.– Stanford Univ. Press.– 1974.– pp. 26– 57.
  9. Mallon J.V. et al. Category accessibility: An alternative explanation for the effects of "Patterning" on aggressive behavior// Aggress. Behav.– 1992.– 18, N 6, pp. 401–410.
  10. Margolin G., Patterson G. Differenial consequences provided by mothers and fathers for their son and daughters// Devel. Psycol.– 1975, N 11.– pp. 537–538.
  11. McCabe A., Lipscomb T.J. Sex differences in children's verbal agression // Merrill–Palmer Quart.– 1988.– 34.– N 4.– pp. 389–401 .
  12. McDougall W. An Introduction to Social Psychology.– L., 1908.
  1. Murray H.A. Explorations in Personality.– N.Y., 1938.
  2. O’Leary K.D. Wilson G.T. Behavior therapy.– N.J., 1975.– 496p.
  3. O’Neal E.C., Taylor S.L. Status of the provoker, opportunity to retaliate, and interest in video violence // Agress. Behav.– 198 9.– 15.– N 2.– pp. 171–180.
  1. Palardy J. Behavior modification: It does work, but...// J. Inst. Psychol.– 1992.– 19, N 2.– pp. 127–131.
  2. Scheungrab M. Die Abbildung von Beziehungen zwischen Medienkonsum und Delinquenz im Rahmen Kansanalytischer Modelle// Arch. Psychol.– 1990.– 142, N 4, pp. 295–322.
  3. Sears R., Maccoby E., Levin H. Patterns of Child Rearing.– Evanston, 1957.– pp. 484–486.
  4. Severson R. Adler, Agon and aggression // Individ. Psychol.– 1990.– 46, N 3, pp. 324–357.

67.Stokes T.F., Osnes P.G. An operant pursuit of generalization // Behav. Ther.– 1989.– 20,

— 86 —
Ñòðàíèöà: 1 ... 81828384858687